<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Software-Engineering on Brian Li - Insights</title><link>http://insights.brianli.net/tags/software-engineering/</link><description>Recent content in Software-Engineering on Brian Li - Insights</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://insights.brianli.net/tags/software-engineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Over-Engineering Trap: When Solving One Problem Creates Two More</title><link>http://insights.brianli.net/posts/the-over-engineering-trap/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://insights.brianli.net/posts/the-over-engineering-trap/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-you-feel-held-hostage-by-your-own-tech">Why You Feel Held Hostage by Your Own Tech&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>There is a specific, quiet dread that settles in when you realize you don&amp;rsquo;t actually run your business anymore — your codebase does. You&amp;rsquo;re a designer by trade and a CEO by title, yet you find yourself spending your days managing the repercussions of prior builds, a polite euphemism for cleaning up the disasters left behind by a former developer. Instead of a lean business asset, you inherited a labyrinth of overly complicated code that managed to create two new problems for every one it solved.&lt;sup id="fnref:1">&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1&lt;/a>&lt;/sup> Rather than seeing this as a personal failure, it&amp;rsquo;s important to see it as it really is: an industry trap. You have effectively become a &lt;strong>Human API&lt;/strong>, manually bridging gaps and soothing angry customers because the system is too fragile to touch.&lt;sup id="fnref:2">&lt;a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">2&lt;/a>&lt;/sup>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>